Book Assessment
QuScor tackles Quantum Readiness Reporting ahead of regulatory deadlines, audit, or insurance requests — so you're ready to meet the new quantum standards of tomorrow.
Aligned with QHelm Middleware →One structured engagement, four steps, no PQC architecture deep-dive required on your end.
You complete a guided cryptographic-posture questionnaire covering inventory, custody, vendors, and monitoring.
Answers are scored against a weighted readiness model, calibrated to your sector — custodian, defense, or general.
You receive four documents: a full comprehensive findings report, a board-ready executive summary, a management SWOT analysis with live regulatory threat context, and an auditor-facing technical summary.
Findings are mapped to SOC 2, NIST SP 800-171, and NIS2 language so your auditor or underwriter can use it directly.
Weighted differently depending on whether you're a digital-asset custodian, a defense contractor, or neither.
Do you know where every key, cert, and algorithm actually lives?
Can you move to ML-KEM / ML-DSA without a system rebuild?
How keys are generated, stored, rotated, and recovered.
What's being encrypted today that an adversary could store and break later.
How exposed you are to a single vendor's PQC timeline.
Whether crypto drift and deprecated configs actually get flagged.
QuScor runs on a Python-native proprietary scoring engine built in-house by Owlpha Labs — the same engine behind every report, calibrated to your sector, current as of your assessment date.
Every engagement scores six fixed categories — cryptographic inventory, algorithm agility, key custody architecture, harvest-now-decrypt-later exposure, vendor dependency, and monitoring readiness — each on a 0–100 scale, rolled up through a weighted formula into a single Quantum Readiness Score.
The same six categories are reweighted through a sector overlay — custodian, defense / government contractor, or general enterprise — so a digital-asset custodian's SOC 2 exposure and a defense subcontractor's CNSA 2.0 timeline are scored against different priorities, not one generic rubric.
Every report is generated against a curated regulatory deadline calendar — FIPS 140-2 sunset, CNSA 2.0, White House EO, NIST phase-out milestones — updated each assessment cycle. The SWOT and findings sections reflect the threat environment at the time of your engagement, not a static template written six months prior.
Findings carry an evidence tier — from self-attested questionnaire responses up through validated technical corroboration — so your auditor or underwriter can see exactly how much independent verification stands behind each number.
Every engagement produces four documents from the same scoring data — auto-generated by the QuScor engine from your intake, not templated by hand.
Full per-question breakdown: every category scored, every gap surfaced with a finding and remediation action, NIST crosswalk, regulatory deadline calendar, and phased roadmap.
Board-ready: the score, the band, and the three things leadership actually needs to act on.
Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and a live quantum threat section — populated with current regulatory deadlines and active nation-state threat context at the time of your engagement.
NIST standards reference table, 19-item evidence checklist, compliance crosswalk across SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, DORA, and CNSA 2.0, and an assessor attestation block.
QuScor isn't a substitute for your SOC 2 examination or your CMMC assessment — it's the quantum-readiness documentation that feeds into them.
If a finding surfaces a serious harvest-now-decrypt-later or crypto-agility gap, we'll tell you — and what closing it would take.
No PQC architecture deep-dive required — just your current cryptographic posture, in your own words.